What must be included in a medical-legal report concerning contested medical issues?

The correct answer highlights the importance of focusing on the evaluator's competence when addressing contested medical issues in a medical-legal report. A Qualified Medical Evaluator is expected to provide assessments and opinions grounded in their expertise. This ensures that the evaluator can offer a well-informed and reliable analysis of the issues that are being contested.

When the report focuses solely on issues within the evaluator's knowledge and skill set, it enhances the credibility of the findings. These evaluations are essential in legal contexts where accurate medical information can influence outcomes significantly. By adhering to this standard, the evaluator avoids venturing into areas where they may lack appropriate scientific or clinical understanding, thus maintaining the integrity and reliability of their report.

In contrast, addressing matters outside an evaluator's expertise can lead to misinformation and may undermine the report's validity. Similarly, including unrelated issues or those not supported by evidence can detract from the focus and effectiveness of the evaluation, making it less useful in a legal setting. The specificity of the issues covered ensures that the report remains relevant and impactful.