Which action may represented workers take after a QME discloses a COI?

When a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) discloses a conflict of interest (COI), it is essential for the workers to consider how this situation impacts the integrity of the evaluation process. The option to request a change of evaluator is appropriate because it allows workers to address potential bias that may arise from the disclosed COI. This action emphasizes the importance of ensuring that evaluations are conducted fairly and objectively, thus protecting the workers' rights during the claims process.

Addressing a conflict of interest is crucial in maintaining trust in the evaluation results. When workers request a different evaluator, they are taking a proactive step to safeguard their interests and ensure that the medical evaluation is unbiased and credible. This action aligns with the principle of obtaining a fair assessment, thus reinforcing the overall integrity of the workers' compensation system.

Choosing to confront the QME directly may not be productive or appropriate, and ignoring the disclosure undermines the importance of transparency in the evaluation process. Submitting false information is unethical and could have serious consequences for the workers involved. Therefore, requesting a change of evaluator is the most sensible and legitimate course of action when a conflict of interest has been disclosed.