Which condition would NOT be grounds for a claim related to psychiatric injury?

In the context of psychiatric injury claims, an employee’s notification of termination generally does not constitute grounds for a claim because the emotional distress arising from being terminated is typically viewed as an expected and normal reaction rather than an extraordinary event. Claims for psychiatric injuries often hinge on situations where the employee encounters unexpected and dramatic conditions that contribute directly to their mental health issues.

In contrast, other options reflect situations that can lead to legitimate psychiatric claims. For example, being subjected to a violent act in the workplace is a clear example of an extraordinary event that could lead to significant psychological trauma, making it valid grounds for a claim. Similarly, sudden and extreme changes in the work environment can trigger psychiatric conditions as they cause psychological distress that is severe and sudden.

Chronic job stress can also contribute to claims, particularly when associated with extreme circumstances; however, typical chronic job stress without extraordinary conditions would not suffice for a claim, but instead would likely be viewed as a normal aspect of the work environment. Thus, the situation that arises after notification of termination is seen as part of the routine employment process and hence does not meet the criteria for a psychiatric injury claim.