Which of the following actions might justify an injured worker's discontinuation of a comprehensive medical-legal evaluation?

Intoxication during the evaluation presents a significant reason for discontinuing a comprehensive medical-legal evaluation. The integrity and validity of the evaluation process rely heavily on the ability of the injured worker to provide accurate history, understand the questions posed, and engage in a coherent dialogue with the evaluator. If an individual is under the influence of drugs or alcohol, their cognitive faculties and judgment may be impaired, which can compromise the entire evaluation. This not only affects the accuracy of their report but can also pose a risk to the evaluator's ability to conduct the examination safely and effectively.

In contrast, while additional tests, unfounded complaints, or concerns about paperwork might raise issues during the evaluation process, they do not inherently jeopardize the validity and safety of the evaluation in the same manner as intoxication does. The other scenarios require additional management or discussion, but they do not necessitate immediate discontinuation of the evaluation as intoxication would.