Which of the following is a reason for disciplinary action against a QME after a hearing?

Disciplinary action against a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) is often predicated on violations that impact the integrity and effectiveness of their role in the workers' compensation process. The choice that addresses a violation of material statutory or administrative duty is particularly significant because it encompasses breaches of legal or regulatory requirements that govern a QME's practice.

These statutory and administrative duties are clearly outlined by legislation and regulatory bodies to ensure that QMEs adhere to professional standards, maintain objective evaluations, and provide unbiased opinions in medical assessments. Such violations can jeopardize the fairness of workers' compensation claims and the ability to provide just outcomes for injured workers, which is why they are taken very seriously and can lead to disciplinary actions.

Other options, while potentially concerning in terms of practice quality or patient care, do not specifically implicate legal or regulatory obligations that could result in formal disciplinary actions as defined in the context of QME responsibilities. For instance, patient satisfaction and follow-up care may relate more to practice standards and patient relationships rather than to the legal frameworks overseeing QME conduct.