Which type of supplemental report focuses solely on reviewing medical records?

The correct answer focuses on a specific type of report that is typically generated to ensure accuracy and clarity regarding the information contained in an initial report. This type of report, known for its emphasis on addressing discrepancies or inaccuracies, specifically targets factual details found in medical records without adding new clinical findings or additional opinions.

In the context of the choices provided, this type of supplemental report can be crucial for maintaining the integrity of the medical evaluation process. By concentrating solely on the review and correction of factual information, it serves as a tool for rectifying any misunderstandings or miscommunications that may have arisen from the original report.

The other report types listed serve different purposes: the comprehensive report is more all-encompassing, including extensive evaluations and insights beyond just factual review; the follow-up report involves ongoing assessments or updates based on new findings; and the disputed facts report addresses particular disagreements regarding the facts of a case rather than performing a direct review of existing medical records for inaccuracies. Thus, the focus on factual correction distinguishes it as a targeted supplement for ensuring the reliability of the underlying data.